Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
Hall of Shame
From Bad To Worse In Ethics

From Bad To Worse In Ethics
August 31, 2003

Hartford Courant Editorial

 




Putting the best face on another major embarrassment, Gov. John G. Rowland last week called his agreement to pay $6,015.17 for disallowed credit card charges "a fair and reasonable settlement" with the state Elections Enforcement Commission.

Mr. Rowland's constituents couldn't be blamed, however, for thinking that this latest settlement with a state watchdog agency is another piece of disturbing evidence that the three-term governor is, at best, ethically obtuse.

Mr. Rowland and the state Republican Party agreed to make payments to the general fund to settle charges of faulty record-keeping and reimbursement practices in connection with the use of party-issued American Express credit cards. The cards are to be used only for party-building purposes or other party-related expenses. The commission said, however, that some of the expenses were personal. The state party will pay $1,500. Under the agreement, party officials basically said they had done nothing wrong - and will never do it again.

Among Mr. Rowland's credit card charges termed improper by the election enforcement commission were expenses for kayaking in Idaho, golf in a San Diego suburb, restaurant meals in Fort Lauderdale and Litchfield County and hotel stays in Florida, Ohio, Connecticut and Pennsylvania. Some of the hotel stays were for high school or college reunions, a commission report concluded. Mr. Rowland disagreed with the commission's interpretation of the law, arguing that all the expenses were related to political events and thus to party-building activity. He signed the agreement anyway.

The settlement should be a wake-up call for the state Republican Party to tighten its use of credit cards. Contributors don't give money so it can be frittered away on personal expenses rung up by party officials and leaders.

The settlement signed by Mr. Rowland gives him another black eye. In April 1997, he paid a $2,000 fine for accepting concert tickets, the first ethics fine levied against a sitting Connecticut governor. A month later, Rowland staff and family members returned surplus military items taken from a state warehouse. Earlier this summer, the governor agreed to pay about $9,000 to settle a State Ethics Commission investigation into Mr. Rowland's discounted vacation stays at homes belonging to people who do business with the state.

The governor's fondness for freebies betrays an arrogance and sense of entitlement that is dangerous in a public official.

And then there are the activities of some of his appointees and friends who have pleaded guilty to crimes, are awaiting trial or are under investigation. It is not a record to be proud of.